Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, applied for bail in a Sessions trial concerning the alleged assault and death of Subhash Kumar, charged under Sections 126(2), 352, 115(2), 109(1), 103 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with ten others, attacked the victim with a sharp weapon, resulting in his death. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the FIR is vague, contains no specific allegation against him, and that he has no prior criminal record, having been in custody since 17‑08‑2025. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. After hearing both sides, the Court found merit in the petitioner's arguments and ordered that he be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑VIII, Gaya.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case involving alleged assault and homicide under the B.N.S., 2023.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • homicide
  • B.N.S. 2023
  • Patna High Court
  • Sessions trial

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4960 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2025 Thana- MAGADH UNIVERSITY District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Chhotu Kumar S/o Ram Baran Manjhi R/o Village - Puravi Matihani, P.S -
                 Magadh University, District - Gaya

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Dinesh Manjhi S/o Late Gopal Manjhi R/o Village - Puravi Matihani, P.S -
                 Magadh University, District - Gaya

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Anand Kishore Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with

                   Sessions Trial No. 1162 of 2025(S.J.) arising out of Magadh

                   University P.S. Case No. 85 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 126(2), 352, 115(2), 109(1), 103, 3(5)

                   of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the

                   petitioner along with 10 other persons have assaulted the son of

                   the informant, namely, Subhash Kumar, with sharp cutting

                   weapon at his stomach, who died during the course of treatment.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4960 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned

                     counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the FIR, it

                     is clear that the nature of allegation is general and omnibus. There

                     is no specific allegation against this petitioner of assaulting

                     anybody. He further submits that a statement has been made in

                     para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent

                     and he is languishing in judicial custody since 17.08.2025.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.         The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of

                     the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional

                     Chief Judicial Magistrate-VIII, Gaya in connection with Sessions

                     Trial No. 1162/2025 (S.J.) arising out of Magadh University P.S.

                     Case No. 85 of 2025.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.