Patna High Court
Sayed Rizwan Ahmad @ Rizwan @ RojinversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- PURNENDU SINGH
Holding
Pre‑arrest bail was denied.
Summary
The petitioner, Sayed Rizwan Ahmad, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 112(2), 336(2), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 11 of the West Bengal Gambling Act. The High Court noted that the petitioner has eight pending criminal cases, indicating a substantial criminal antecedent. The court also observed that the allegations against him are serious in nature. Considering these factors, the judge was not inclined to grant bail. Consequently, the application for pre‑arrest bail was rejected.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to pre‑arrest bail despite multiple pending criminal cases and the seriousness of the alleged offences
Legislation cited
- BNS — s. 112(2), 336(2), 3(5)
Subjects
- pre‑arrest bail
- criminal antecedents
- serious offence
- bail denial
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50010 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2025 Thana- MALSALAMI District- Patna
======================================================
Sayed Rizwan Ahmad @ Rizwan @ Rojin S/O Nek @ Naki Ahmad R/O
Mohalla- Nagla, P.S- Malsalami, Distt.- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
ORAL ORDER
4 17-01-2026 Heard Mr. Pramod Kumar, learned counsel appearing
on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection
with Malsalami P.S. Case No. 217/2025 registered for the
offence(s) punishable under Sections 112(2),336(2),3(5) of the
BNS and Section 11 of West Bengal Gambling Act.
3. Considering the criminal antecedents of the
petitioner, who is involved in altogether 8 criminal cases, which
are pending against him and also considering the fact that the
allegation against the petitioner is serious in nature, I am not
inclined to enlarge the petitioner on pre-arrest bail.
4. Accordingly, the present application stands
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50010 of 2025(4) dt.17-01-2026
2/2
rejected.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
Ashishsingh/-
U T
Checking your session…