Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nishant Kumar @ Nishant Kumar Rajput @ Kunal @ RaukyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, directing him to furnish a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Summary

The Patna High Court considered an application for bail filed by Nishant Kumar, accused in Mahua Police Station Case No. 1431 of 2024 for an offence under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleged to involve looting of Rs 2,83,000. The petitioner asserted that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants, and that apart from a confessional statement no material was recovered; he had been in judicial custody since 25‑04‑2025. The State opposed bail, relying on the petitioner’s two prior criminal cases. After weighing the submissions and the lack of substantive evidence, the court held that continued detention was unwarranted. Consequently, the court ordered the petitioner to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 in view of the alleged looting and the petitioner’s confessional statement.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • confessional statement
  • prior criminal antecedent
  • theft
  • Section 309(4)
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5010 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1431 Year-2024 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Nishant Kumar @ Nishant Kumar Rajput @ Kunal @ Rauky Son of Dinesh
                 Singh Resident of village- Narangi Jagdish, Ps- Jaitpur, Dist- Muzaffarpur

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                    Heard Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, learned APP for the

                   State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Mahua P.S. Case No. 1431 of 2024 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                   Further, Section 309(4) has also been added.

                                3. The case of the prosecution in short is that

                   unknown miscreants have looted altogether Rs. 2,83,000/- from

                   the informant.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5010 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     was lodged against unknown miscreants. During the course of

                     investigation, the petitioner was remanded in this case from

                     Mahua P.S. Case No. 182 of 2025; thereupon, the petitioner has

                     given his confessional statement. He also submits that nothing

                     has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Save

                     and except the confessional statement, there is nothing against

                     the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is

                     languishing in judicial custody since 25.04.2025.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal

                     antecedent of two cases.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     A.C.J.M.-IV, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Mahua P.S.

                     Case No. 1431 of 2024.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.