Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Aditya Anand @ Ady Aditya @ HarishankarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the regular bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn, granting liberty to re‑apply after charge framing.

Summary

The petitioner, Aditya Anand, was implicated in a criminal miscellaneous case (PS Case No. 354 of 2024) in Saharsa district. He filed a regular bail application before the High Court of Patna. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to file a fresh bail petition after the charges were formally framed. The Court, after hearing arguments, granted the request to withdraw the application. Consequently, the regular bail application was dismissed as withdrawn, with the petitioner free to re‑apply for bail post‑charge framing.

Issues considered

  • Whether a regular bail application may be withdrawn and the petitioner be permitted to re‑file for bail after the framing of charge

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • withdrawal of bail application
  • criminal procedure
  • framing of charge
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5052 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2024 Thana- SAUR BAZAR District- Saharsa
                  ======================================================
                  Aditya Anand @ Ady Aditya @ Harishankar Son of Vijendra Yadav Village
                  -Sohwara PS -Sonbarsha Raj District -Saharsa

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Ms. Muskan Singh
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    30-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after some

                    argument seeks permission to withdraw the regular bail

                    application with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after

                    framing of charge.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. The regular bail application of the petitioner is

                    dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.