Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kewal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Kewal Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. After hearing, the petitioner, through counsel Binod Kumar Sinha, requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court granted the request and ordered that the anticipatory bail application be dismissed as withdrawn. No further directions were issued.

Issues considered

  • Whether the anticipatory bail application should be entertained after the petitioner seeks its withdrawal.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50838 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-419 Year-2024 Thana- SAUR BAZAR District- Saharsa
                  ======================================================
                  Kewal Yadav Son of Late Mainu Yadav Resident of village - Bhavtiya, Ward
                  No.- 7, P.S.- Sour Bazar, Dist.- Saharsa.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar =

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Akbar Ali
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

4    16-03-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                              2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some

                    arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail

                    application.

                              3.    Permission is accorded.

                              4.    Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.