Patna High Court
Viccky Singh @ Vikky Singh @ Vikki SinghversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The court held that regular bail cannot be granted as the trial has concluded and the case is fixed for hearing.
Summary
The petitioner, Viccky Singh, applied for regular bail in a case involving offences under Sections 307, 302, 120B, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petition was his fourth attempt to obtain bail. The learned counsel informed the court that the trial had already concluded and the matter was only awaiting a final hearing. The court held that because the trial was over and the case was set for hearing, it would not grant bail. Consequently, the petition for regular bail was rejected, and the trial court was directed to expedite the final hearing.
Issues considered
- Whether regular bail can be granted when the trial has concluded and the case is fixed for a final hearing
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 27
- Indian Penal Code — s. 120B, 302, 307, 34
Subjects
- bail
- regular bail
- trial concluded
- IPC
- Arms Act
- high court
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5090 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2020 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura
======================================================
Viccky Singh @ Vikky Singh @ Vikki Singh Son of Maharana Singh @
Maharana prasad Singh R/o Village-Khoparia (Khopariya) P.S-Chousa
District-Madhepura
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pawan Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 22-04-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chausa
PS Case No. 237 of 2020 for the offences punishable under
Sections 307, 302, 120B and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the
Arms Act.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset,
submits that this is the forth attempt of the petitioner to seek
regular bail.
4. On query of the court with regard to the stage of
the trial, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner fairly submits that the trial has concluded and the case
is fixed for hearing.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5090 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
2/2
5. Since the trial has concluded and the case now is
fixed for hearing, hence the Court is not inclined to release the
petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the
petitioner is rejected.
7. However, the learned trial court is directed to
ensure that the final hearing is concluded expeditiously.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…