Patna High Court
Ram Chandra GuptaversusThe State Of Bihar Through Deputy Superintendent Of Police / S.h.o. Economic Offence Unit, Bihar, P
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
- Bench
- SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Holding
The application was dismissed for default due to non‑prosecution.
Summary
Ram Chandra Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared on his behalf on two consecutive dates, 12 February 2026 and 7 April 2026. The petitioner apparently chose not to pursue the matter. The court, noting the absence of the petitioner and lack of prosecution, dismissed the application for default. The dismissal was pronounced by Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear and does not wish to pursue a criminal miscellaneous application?
Subjects
- criminal procedure
- default judgment
- non‑prosecution
- high court
- criminal miscellaneous application
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51168 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2013 Thana- ECONOMIC OFFENCES, BIHAR
District- Patna
======================================================
Ram Chandra Gupta S/o Late Nathu Prasad Gupta, R/o Vill.- Manshapur,
P.S.- Laukahi, District- Madhubani at present posted as Executive Engineer
Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar Through Deputy Superintendent Of Police / S.h.o.
Economic Offence Unit, Bihar, Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the EOU : Mr. V.N.P Sinha, Sr. Advocate.
Mr. Vijay Anand, Advocate.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
3 07-04-2026 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner, however,
learned counsel for the Economic Offence Unit is present.
2. On the previous date also i.e. on 12.02.2026, no one
was present on behalf of the petitioner and the case was
adjourned. The matter relates to the year 2018.
3. It appears that the petitioner does not want to
pursue the matter, accordingly, the present Cr. Misc. Application
stands dismissed for default due to non-prosecution.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-
U T
Checking your session…