Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

GUDDU SAH @ GUDDU KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that, in the absence of any direct allegation against the petitioners, bail must be granted.

Summary

The petitioners Guddu Sah and Ramchandra Sah applied for regular bail in a case (Sheohar P.S. Case No. 375 of 2025) involving offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including assault and related provisions. They were in custody since 9 October 2025 and claimed they were falsely implicated, with no direct allegation against them. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the charges. The court examined the lack of specific allegations linking the petitioners to the alleged assault and found no substantive basis to deny bail. Consequently, the court allowed the bail applications, directing the petitioners to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to regular bail despite the serious nature of the offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
  • Whether there is sufficient direct evidence linking the petitioners to the alleged assault to justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • assault
  • false implication
  • court order

Judgment

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.513 of 2026
     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2025 Thana- SHEOHAR District- Sheohar
======================================================
Guddu Sah @ Guddu Kumar Son of Ramji Sah Resident of village - Mali
Pokharbhinda, P.S.- Sheohar, District - Sheohar.


                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                      Versus
The State of Bihar


                                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
                                        with
                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 712 of 2026

     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2025 Thana- SHEOHAR District- Sheohar
======================================================
Ramchandra Sah Son of Late Saryug Sah Resident of village - Mali
Pokharbhinda, P.S.- Sheohar, District - Sheohar.


                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                      Versus
The State of Bihar


                                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 513 of 2026)
For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr.Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                 Ms. Divya Bharti, Advocate
For the State           :        Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 712 of 2026)
For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr.Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                Ms. Divya Bharti, Advocate
For the State           :       Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP
======================================================
         Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.513 of 2026(4) dt.24-03-2026
                                                     2/3




                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                    ORAL ORDER

4   24-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State in both the aforesaid cases.

                                2. The petitioner of both the aforesaid cases seeks bail

                   in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 375 of 2025

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(1),

                   115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 74, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya

                   Nyaya Sanhita to which Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita was added.

                                3. The petitioners and others are said to have assaulted

                   the victim. One Shivan Kumar is the main accused who has

                   assaulted the victim.

                                4. The petitioners are in custody since 09.10.2025.

                                5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

                   this case.

                                6. Learned APP appearing for the State and learned

                   counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for regular

                   bail of the petitioners.

                                7. Considering the fact that there is no direct

                   allegation against the present petitioners, these applications are

                   allowed.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.513 of 2026(4) dt.24-03-2026
                                                       3/3




                                  8. Let the petitioner of both the aforesaid cases, above

                     named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

                     10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like

                     amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial

                     Magistrate, Sheohar/ concerned Court below in connection with

                     Sheohar P.S. Case No. 375 of 2025.




                                                                        (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.