Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dayanand kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to withdraw his anticipatory bail application, resulting in its dismissal as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Dayanand Kumar Gupta, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with PS case No. 66 of 2025. He later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw that application. The primary issue before the court was whether the petitioner could be allowed to withdraw his anticipatory bail plea. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, found no impediment to the withdrawal and granted the petitioner's request. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application?

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of bail application
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5139 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2025 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur
                  ======================================================
                  Dayanand kumar Gupta S/O Banarsi Sah Residents of Vill.- Ward No. 15,
                  Dahri Naletha, P.S- Dhari Baletha, P.S- Beldaur, District- Bhagalpur.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Bhim Kumar Yadav, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Nityanand, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    25-02-2026                     1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.

                    Bhim Kumar Yadav and learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                    2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks

                    permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                    4. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                          (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.