Patna High Court
Guddu Kumar @ Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The court granted provisional anticipatory bail, subject to a bond, sureties, a deposit, and verification of the petitioner’s antecedent cases.
Summary
The petitioner, Guddu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of over 3,200 litres of liquor from vehicles linked to him. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized liquor, did not own the vehicles, and was implicated solely on secret information without a proper investigation. The State opposed the bail, contending that the seriousness of the offence warranted his arrest. The High Court, considering the petitioner's lack of direct possession and the procedural deficiencies, granted provisional anticipatory bail conditioned on a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and a deposit of Rs 5,000 with the Advocates’ Association. The order further directed the trial court to verify the petitioner’s criminal antecedents and to confirm the bail only if he has no more than two prior cases, otherwise the bail would not be confirmed.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
- Whether the reliance on secret information without a proper investigation justifies denial of bail.
- What conditions may be imposed on anticipatory bail, including verification of antecedent cases.
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- excise law
- secret information
- bail conditions
- criminal antecedents
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5164 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-492 Year-2025 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Guddu Kumar @ Abhishek Kumar S/o Surendra Ray Resident of Village-
Kharhania Khas, P.S.- Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No. Ii
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 02-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of
Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner has antecedent of two cases under the Excise Act and
allegation is of recovery of 3234.945 litres of liquor from a
truck and a pick up vehicle. It is next submitted that petitioner
was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered
from his conscious possession and is not the owner of any of the
seized vehicle and he came to be implicated based on secret
information which is the easiest way to implicate someone. It is
also submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5164 of 2026(2) dt.02-02-2026
2/3
relating to excise, the police starts implicating mechanically
either through chowkidar, local person, confessional statement
or secret information without holding a proper investigation.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below
within a period of six weeks from today, be released on
provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of
Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where
the case is pending/successor court in connection with Paroo
P.S. Case No.492/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down
under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
6. It is made clear that the learned trial court thereafter
shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the
event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than
two cases, in that event, it would be presumed that petitioner
had concealed his antecedent before this court, as such, the
provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if
on verification it is found that petitioner has antecedent of two
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5164 of 2026(2) dt.02-02-2026
3/3
cases, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall
be confirmed forthwith.
7. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner
based on instruction submits that petitioner undertakes to
deposit an amount of Rs.5000/- with Advocates’ Association,
Patna High Court within a period of two weeks from today.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.