Patna High Court
SANJEEV KUMAR @ PINTUversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- CONSIGNED
- Bench
- PURNENDU SINGH
Holding
No adjudication is required and the bail application is consigned to the records.
Summary
The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar, filed a bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from an alleged offence in Gaya district. The petitioner and the second opposite party, Reshu Kumari (his wife), appeared before the High Court and jointly submitted that they have been living together peacefully for over a year. The learned counsel for the State also appeared. The Court noted the parties' amicable settlement and observed that no further adjudication on the merits was necessary. Consequently, the bail application was not decided on merits but was consigned to the records for further consideration. The order was delivered by Justice Purnendu Singh.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the parties' amicable settlement
Subjects
- bail
- criminal miscellaneous
- amicable settlement
- pending adjudication
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54570 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2022 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya
======================================================
Sanjeev Kumar @ Pintu Son of Late Vinay Kumar @ Late Vinay Singh @
Late Vinay Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Lohanipur Ps- Tekari (Mau
O.P.), Dist- Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Reshu Kumari @ Kumari Samiksha Wife of Sanjeev Kumar @ Pintu
Resident of Village- Lohanipur, Ps- Tekari (Mau Op.), Dist- Gaya, Presently
Residing At Village- Nishurpur, Ps- Konch, Dist- Gaya
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate.
For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate.
For the State : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
ORAL ORDER
6 17-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the
O.P. No.2.
2. The petitioner and the O.P. No.2 appeared before
this Court in person and jointly submitted that good sense has
prevailed between them and they are living a happy and
peaceful life together for more than one year.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission of the parties,
no adjudication is required.
4. The present bail application is consigned to records.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
mantreshwar/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.