Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ashutosh MishraversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail, holding that the successful mediation and mutual withdrawal of complaints removed the justification for incarceration.

Summary

Ashutosh Mishra applied for bail anticipating arrest in a case involving offences under IPC sections 323 and 498A and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The matter had been referred to mediation on 17‑10‑2025, where the parties reached a settlement and agreed to withdraw the complaints against each other. Both the petitioner’s counsel and the counsel for the second opposite party, Nidhi Mishra, affirmed that the mediation was successful and the dispute was amicably resolved. The court, noting the compromise and the lack of necessity for incarceration, granted bail on the condition that the petitioner furnishes a bail bond of Rs.2,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 482(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The application was allowed, and the petitioner was released on bail.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in a case where the parties have settled the dispute through mediation and agreed to withdraw the complaints.
  • Whether the existence of a compromise negates the need for custodial detention pending trial.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • mediation
  • compromise
  • IPC 323
  • IPC 498A
  • Dowry Prohibition Act
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 482
  • anticipatory bail
  • settlement

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54811 of 2025
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2021 Thana- SAHARSA COMPLAINT CASE District-
                                                         Saharsa
                 ======================================================
                 Ashutosh Mishra, S/O Bipin Kumar Mishra R/O Village- Ramdiri, P.S-
                 Matihani, Distt.- Begusarai, Bihar. Also residing at Quarter No. T2/4,
                 Teacher's Colony, Central School, P.S- Ramgarh, Distt.- Ramgarh, Jharkhand.

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Nidhi Mishra W/O Ashutosh Mishra, D/O Sri Mohit Mishra R/O Village-
                 Sah Colony, Patratu, P.S- Patratu, Dist.- Ramgarh. Permanent Address R/O
                 Kendriya Vidyalaya, Ramgarh Cantt., P.S- Ramgarh, Distt.- Ramgarh.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr.Pramod Mishra
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Ms.Shaheen Begum- A.P.P.
                                                Mr.Mukesh Kumar
                                                Mr.Priya Ranjan
                                                Mr.Sudeep Kumar
                                                Mr.Anunay Shahi
                                                Mr.Nitish Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   09-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   APP for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of

                   the complainant.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his

                   arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 323 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections

                   3 and 4 of the D. P. Act.

                                3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the case was referred for mediation by an order dated
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54811 of 2025(4) dt.09-02-2026
                                            2/3




          17.10.2025. It is next submitted that mediation was successful

          and the parties have compromised. It is also submitted that

          before the learned Mediator, it was also agreed that both

          petitioner and the opposite party no.2 shall withdraw the cases

          filed by them against each other. It is next submitted that in

          terms of the agreement, the petitioner has filed an application

          seeking withdrawal of the case, but then, a day later then what

          was agreed before the learned Mediator. It is also submitted that

          since the dispute has been resolved amicably, as such, no useful

          purpose would be served by sending the petitioner to jail.

                       4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

          opposite party no.2 also does not dispute the said submission of

          the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the

          mediation was successful and parties have resolved their dispute

          amicably.

                       5. Considering the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the parties, the petitioner, above-named, in the event

          of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks, is

          directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in

          the sum of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial

          Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54811 of 2025(4) dt.09-02-2026
                                                           3/3




                         with Complaint Case No.54(C) of 2021, subject to the

                         conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

                                      6. The application stands allowed.



                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.