Patna High Court
Shankar JhaversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Anticipatory bail was not granted to the petitioner.
Summary
Shankar Jha applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged theft of petrol from a pipeline and possession of 1.5 kg of charas. The prosecution alleged that on 16 February 2025 the petitioner’s oil tanker was used to puncture a pipeline and that charas was found beneath the tanker seat. The petitioner claimed innocence and a clean antecedent, while the State opposed bail. The court examined the seriousness of the offences under the NDPS Act, the Petroleum and Mineral Pipe Line Act and related statutes. Considering the alleged involvement in fuel theft and drug possession, the court declined to grant anticipatory bail and dismissed the application. The order was limited to the bail application and does not prejudice the merits of the trial.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the alleged offences under the NDPS Act, Petroleum and Mineral Pipe Line Act and related statutes.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S., 2023 — s. 111, 287, 303(2), 317(2), 324(5), 3(5), 61(2), 62
- E.C. Act — s. 7
- Exclusive Substance Act — s. ¾
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act — s. 15, 17(C), 18(C), 20(b)(ii)(c), 23, 25, 8
- Petrol and Mineral Pipe Line Act — s. 15(2), 15(3), 15(4)
- Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act — s. ¾
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- NDPS Act
- petroleum theft
- charas possession
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55713 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2025 Thana- KOTWA District- East Champaran
======================================================
Shankar Jha son of Dwarikanath Jha RESIDENT OF SANTOSHPUR GOVT.
COLONY, MAHESHTALA SOUTH 24, PS- MAHESHTALA DIST- SOUTH
24 PARGANAS WEST BENGAL
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Alka Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
7 05-05-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Kotwa P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025/ NDPS G.R. Case No. 30
of 2025, registered for offences punishable under Sections 8, 15,
17(C), 18(C), 20(b)(ii)(c), 23, 25 of the NDPS Act, Sections
303(2), 287, 317(2), 324(5), 111, 61(2), 62, 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023
Section 15(2), 15(3), 15(4) of Petrol and Mineral Pipe Line Act,
Section ¾ of Exclusive Substance Act, ¾ of Prevention of
Damage to Public Property Act and Section 7 of E.C. Act.
3. As per the prosecution story, during night patrolling
on 16.02.2025, police intercepted an oil tanker truck and a Xylo
vehicle near Nawada where the petitioner and their accomplice
were attempting to puncture and oil pipeline to steal fuel. The
oil tanker truck of the petitioner was used in crime which was
given to the driver on monthly rent of Rs. 80,000/-. The co-
accused also disclosed that they have kept charas about 1Kg. 50
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55713 of 2025(7) dt.05-05-2026
2/2
grams below the seat of tanker.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted
that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in
the present case. Petitioner has clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State as well as counsel for the
I.O.C.L have vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory
bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case
and also the petitioner is involved in theft of petrol from the
pipeline and there is recovery of 1 Kg. 50 grams of charas, this
Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to
the petitioner, this application is dismissed.
7. It is made clear that any observation made herein is
prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of
adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations
shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case
and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any
manner.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Ranjeet/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.