Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mithu @ Mithun Kumar @ Mithun MandalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn upon the court’s permission to withdraw.

Summary

Mithu, the petitioner, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court granted the permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • What is the procedure for withdrawing an anticipatory bail application after the petitioner has been arrested?

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • court order

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56829 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2025 Thana- DAGARUA District- Purnia
                  ======================================================
                  Mithu @ Mithun Kumar @ Mithun Mandal Son of Late Upendra Mandal
                  Resident of Kochali, P.S.- Dagarua, District - Purnea

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Md Fazle Karim
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Nityanand
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    05-01-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                              2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset,

                    seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application,

                    as petitioner was arrested during pendency of the instant

                    anticipatory bail application.

                              3.    Permission is accorded.

                              4.    Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.