Patna High Court
Yadu Singh @ Yadunandan Singh and OrsversusThe State Of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
- Bench
- SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Holding
The application is dismissed for default due to non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners, Yadu Singh, Pintu Singh and Neelam Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous application in 2018 but failed to appear before the court on multiple dates, including 07-04-2026 and 27-04-2026. No counsel represented the petitioners, and the State was represented by A.P.P. Anuj Kumar Srivastava. The court observed that the petitioners showed no interest in pursuing the matter, which was several years old. Consequently, the court exercised its power to dismiss the application for default due to non‑prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra, and the petition was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether the criminal miscellaneous application can be entertained when the petitioners fail to appear and show interest in pursuing the matter?
Subjects
- Criminal Procedure Code
- Default judgment
- Non‑prosecution
- Petition dismissal
- Absence of parties
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56887 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-139 Year-2013 Thana- UJIYARPUR District- Samastipur
======================================================
1. Yadu Singh @ Yadunandan Singh, Son of Late Choudhary Singh,
2. Pintu Singh @ Pintu Kumar, Son of Yadu Singh @ Yadunandan Singh.
3. Neelam Devi, Wife of Yadu Singh @ Yadunandan Singh.
All are resident of Village- Dihgawnpur, Police Station- Ujiyarpur, District-
Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Srivastava, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
4 27-04-2026 No one is present on behalf of the petitioners, however,
learned A.P.P. for the State is present.
2. On the previous date also i.e. on 07.04.2026, no one
was present on behalf of the petitioners and the case was
adjourned.
3. Since the petitioners have no interest to pursue this
matter which is of the year 2018, accordingly, the present Cr.
Misc. Application stands dismissed for default due to non-
prosecution.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-
U T
Checking your session…