Patna High Court

Ram Udit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 17 March 2026
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Bench: SATYAVRAT VERMA

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Ram Udit Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court after being implicated in a criminal case (PS Case No. 39 of 2025). While the application was pending, the petitioner was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, arguing that the purpose of the application was defeated by the arrest. The Court, after hearing both parties, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive discussion on the merits of bail was undertaken, as the petition was voluntarily withdrawn by the petitioner.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

anticipatory bail
withdrawal
arrest
criminal procedure
high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5689 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2025 Thana- HULASGANJ District- Jehanabad
                  ======================================================
                  Ram Udit Yadav Son of Late Ramdeo Yadav (Wrongly mentioned in F.I.R. as
                  44 Years), Resident of Village- Gidarpur, P.S.- Hulasganj, District- Jehanabad

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Uday Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Ms. Pushpa Sinha.1
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    17-03-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner, as

                    petitioner was arrested during pendency of the same.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…