Patna High Court

Murshid Islam Nadvi @ Murshid Alam @ Murshidul Nadvi @ Murshidul Islam NadviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 29 April 2026
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Bench: SATYAVRAT VERMA

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Murshid Islam Nadvi, filed a second anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. He later sought the Court's permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested the withdrawal, and the Court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted. The Court granted the petitioner's request, allowing the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

What is the appropriate procedure for withdrawing a pending anticipatory bail application before the High Court?

Subjects

anticipatory bail
withdrawal
criminal procedure
high court
petition dismissed

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5709 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2020 Thana- CHANDAUTI District- Gaya
                  ======================================================
                  Murshid Islam Nadvi @ Murshid Alam @ Murshidul Nadvi @ Murshidul
                  Islam Nadvi Son of Md. Islam Nadvi @ Mohammad Islam Nadvi R/o 311(A)
                  Anup Nagar, P.S. - Indore, District - Indore.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar
            2.     Nikhat Nisar, Son of Md. Nisar Ahmad R/o Mohalla - Aliganj, Road no. 12,
                   Katari Hill Road, PS. - Chandauti, District - Gaya.
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Anunay Shahi, Advocate
                  For the Informant        :      Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    29-04-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                    A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel for the informant.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset,

                    seeks permission to withdraw the second anticipatory bail

                    application.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.


                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
khushbu/-

U      T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…