Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Panchanand SahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that, given the existence of a case‑and‑counter‑case, the petitioner’s clean antecedents and the simple nature of the injury, anticipatory bail should be granted subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Summary

Panchanand Sah was implicated in an FIR alleging assault with a lathi on the informant's wife, resulting in head injuries. The petitioner claimed false implication, noting a family dispute and a case‑and‑counter‑case with only simple injury to the informant's side and a clean antecedent. The State opposed anticipatory bail. The court considered the nature of the dispute, the minor injury, and the petitioner's clean record, and found these factors sufficient to grant anticipatory bail. The bail was conditioned on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and compliance with Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The order directed release upon arrest or surrender within six weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a case involving alleged assault under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS.
  • Whether the existence of a case and counter case and the simple nature of the injury justify the grant of anticipatory bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent warrants relief under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • assault
  • case and counter case
  • clean antecedent
  • simple injury
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5756 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2025 Thana- YADOPUR District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Panchanand Sah, Aged about 52 years, (M), S/o Late Shivpujan Sah,
                 Resident of Village- Hirapakad, P.S.- Jadopur, District- Gopalganj

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Dharmveer, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND
                 MALVIYA
                                       ORAL ORDER
2   04-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2),

                   115(2), 118(2), 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of BNS.

                                3. As per allegation in the FIR, the petitioner along

                   with other co-accused have assaulted by means of lathi on the

                   head of the wife of the informant, as a result of which she

                   sustained head injuries.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He next

                   submits that the petitioner and the informant are own brothers

                   and reside adjacent to each other, with an ongoing dispute for

                   boundary wall between them and there is case and counter case
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5756 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                      2/2




                    between them. He next submits that the injury caused on the

                    person of the informant side which is simple in nature.

                    Petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para-3 of the

                    petition.

                                 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

                    anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                                 6. In view of the aforesaid circumstances as also the

                    fact that there is case and counter case between the parties and

                    both the parties were injured in which only one person from the

                    informant side had received simple injury, so I am inclined to

                    grant anticipatory bail to above-named petitioner. Let the above-

                    named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of

                    his arrest or surrender before the trial Court within a period of

                    six weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

                    (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to

                    satisfaction of the learned ACJM-X, Gopalganj in connection

                    with Yadopur P.S. Case No. 180 of 2025, subject to the

                    condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.



                                                   (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)
Brajesh Kumar/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.