Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jonsan Kumar @ Gulshan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that the petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application, and the application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Jonsan Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. He sought permission from the court to withdraw that application. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Amar Kumar Singh, requested the withdrawal, and the State’s counsel, Ms. Pushpa Sinha, was heard. The court granted permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57639 of 2024
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-198 Year-2024 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL District-
                                                         Begusarai
                  ======================================================
                  Jonsan Kumar @ Gulshan Kumar S/O Asok Yadav R/O Village- Kharhat, P.S-
                  S.Kamal, Distt.- Begusarai.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Amar Kumar Singh
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Ms.Pushpa Sinha.1
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    31-01-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                              2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the instant anticipatory bail

                    application.

                              3.    Permission is accorded.

                              4.    Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.