Patna High Court
MD. NAUSHAD @ NASIAversusThe Union Of India Through The Assistant Director, Directorate Of Enforcement, Patna
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Holding
The application is disposed as infructuous because the petitioner is deceased.
Summary
The petitioner, Md. Naushad, filed a criminal miscellaneous application against the Union of India represented by the Directorate of Enforcement. During the hearing, the Directorate informed the court that the petitioner had died, rendering the petition infructuous. The petitioner’s counsel did not contest this submission. The court considered whether the death of the petitioner affected the continuance of the application. Concluding that the petition could no longer be pursued, the court disposed of the application as infructuous. No substantive merits of the original dispute were examined.
Issues considered
- Whether the criminal miscellaneous application can continue after the death of the petitioner
Subjects
- criminal procedure
- infructuous petition
- death of petitioner
- application disposal
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57733 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2016 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP.
District- Patna
======================================================
MD. NAUSHAD @ NASIA Son of Late Md. Tausheed, Resident of Mohalla-
Mirzapur Bardah, Police Station- Muffasil and District- Munger.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The Union of India Through The Assistant Director, Directorate Of
Enforcement, Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arihant Singh, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Prakrita Sharma, Advocate.
Mr. Abhinav, Advocate.
Ms. Aashi, LC(ED)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
4 01-05-2026 Learned counsel for the Directorate of Enforcement
on the basis of information received from the department
submits that the petitioner had already died and now this
petition has become infructuous.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed
the submission advanced by the learned counsel for the
Directorate of Enforcement.
3. In view of submissions of learned counsels for the
parties, the present Cr. Misc. Application stands disposed of as it
has become infructuous.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-
U T
Checking your session…