Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pratima DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court re‑affirms anticipatory bail for the petitioners, subject to the stipulated deposit, bail bond and repayment conditions, and permits cancellation only upon non‑compliance.

Summary

The petitioners, who are the Chairman, Manager and members of the Lodipur PACS, were charged under Sections 316(5) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for allegedly embezzling Rs 41,81,069 during the procurement and sale of paddy. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the rice was sold in the open market due to spoilage and that they intended to repay the amount. The High Court had earlier granted anticipatory bail on 12‑08‑2025 subject to a 25% deposit of the alleged loss, a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, and a schedule for repaying the balance. On the present application, the petitioners had deposited the 25% but allegedly failed to make further payments, prompting a request for cancellation of bail. The Court, however, reaffirmed the anticipatory bail, directing the lower court to accept the bail bonds and the initial deposit, while allowing the newly appointed Chairman to move for cancellation if the repayment schedule is not complied with. The order is conditioned on compliance with Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 316(5) and 318(4) of the BNSS.
  • Whether the failure to make further instalment payments after the initial 25% deposit warrants cancellation of the bail.
  • Whether the conditions imposed under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the BNSS are sufficient to prevent absconding or tampering with evidence.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • embezzlement
  • cooperative society
  • senior citizens
  • BNSS
  • Section 316
  • Section 318
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57840 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2024 Thana- Kusumbha District- Sheikhpura
                 ======================================================
           1.     Pratima Devi W/O Shailendra Kumar R/O Vill.- Lodipur, P.S. - Kusumbha,
                  District - Sheikhpura
           2.    Prajapati Pandey S/o Late Raghunandan Pandey R/O Vill.- Deole, P.S. -
                 Kusumbha, District - Sheikhpura
           3.    Sharmila Devi W/O Pinku Kumar R/O Vill.- Deole, P.S. - Kusumbha,
                 District - Sheikhpura
           4.    Brahmdeo Thakur S/O Ramjee Thakur R/O Vill.- Deole, P.S. - Kusumbha,
                 District - Sheikhpura
           5.    Rajmuni Devi @ Lalmuni Devi W/O Ramadhin Tanti R/O Vill.- Deole, P.S.
                 - Kusumbha, District - Sheikhpura
           6.    Vinod Manjhi @ Binod Manjhi S/O Late Hari Manjhi R/O Vill.- Deole, P.S.
                 - Kusumbha, District - Sheikhpura

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s                     :        Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s                 :        Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP
                 For Newly appointed Chairman, PACS       :        Mr. Alexander Ashok, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   24-02-2026                 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned

                   APP for the State and learned counsel for newly appointed

                   Chairman of PACS.

                               2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case,

                   registered for the offences under Sections 316(5) and 318(4) of

                   the B.N.S.

                               3. The allegation against these accused persons are

                   that of causing embezzlement of government money to the tune
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57840 of 2025(5) dt.24-02-2026
                                            2/5




          of Rs. 41,81,069/- during the procurement of paddy of Lodipur

          PACS. The Ex-Chairman and the Manager of the PACS namely,

          Naresh Prasad and Manju Lata Pandey had approached this

          Court for anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 30324 of 2025 and

          the same was allowed on 12.08.2025. The following order was

          passed on 12.08.2025:-

                                          “Heard learned counsel for the
                               petitioners, learned counsel for the B.S.F.C.
                               and learned A.P.P. for the State.
                                          2. The petitioners apprehend their
                               arrest in a case registered for the offences
                               punishable under Sections 316 (5) and 318
                               (4) of the B.N.S.
                                          3. The allegation against the
                               petitioners is that of causing embezzlement of
                               government money to the tune of
                               Rs.41,81,069/- during the course of selling of
                               paddy procured by Lodipur PACS.
                                          4. It is submitted by learned
                               counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners
                               are Chairman and Manager of the PACS and
                               have taken specific plea that since the paddy
                               was getting spoiled and damaged, the rice
                               was sold in the open market. However, there
                               is specific statement in para-11 that they are
                               ready to deposit the rice which was due to
                               the authorities. Attention of the Court has
                               been drawn towards Annexure-2 in this
                               regard which is the letter written by the
                               petitioner no.1 (Chairman of PACS) to the
                               District Co-operative Officer, which clearly
                               indicates that there was never an intention to
                               cheat or cause misappropriation and the rice
                               was sold in the open market under
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57840 of 2025(5) dt.24-02-2026
                                            3/5




                               compelling circumstances.
                                          5. Learned counsel for the BSFC
                               opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory
                               bail to the petitioners on the ground of
                               embezzlement of huge amount and causing
                               loss to the State exchequer.
                                          6. However, at this stage, an offer
                               has been made on behalf of the petitioners
                               that they would be making payment of 25%
                               of Rs.41,81,069/- which is the total alleged
                               embezzled amount before furnishing the bail
                               bonds and, out of the rest amount, 10% per
                               month in installments would be paid within a
                               period of eight months.
                                          7. Taking into consideration the
                               facts and circumstances of the case as well as
                               the fact that the petitioners are senior
                               citizens, there is no likelihood of absconding
                               or tampering with the evidence and also the
                               willingness shown to refund the amount and
                               having no criminal antecedent, let the above
                               named petitioners, be released on provisional
                               bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender
                               before the learned Court below within a
                               period of four weeks from today, on
                               furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees
                               Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the
                               like amount each to the satisfaction of the
                               learned lower Court where the case is
                               pending/successor Court in connection with
                               Kusumbha P.S. Case No.64 of 2024, subject
                               to the condition as laid down under Section
                               438 (2) of the Cr.P.C/482 (2) of the Bharatiya
                               Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.
                                          8. The learned Court below is
                               directed to accept the bail bonds of the
                               petitioner after showing deposit of 25% of
                               the alleged embezzled amount in the Co-
                               operative Bank concerned. The provisional
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57840 of 2025(5) dt.24-02-2026
                                            4/5




                             bail of the petitioner shall be confirmed by
                             the learned Court below after deposit of the
                             total alleged embezzled amount within a
                             period of eight months, as offered by the
                             petitioners and stated in para-6 of this order.
                             If the petitioners fail to deposit the said
                             amount within the stipulated period as
                             aforesaid, the learned Court below would be
                             at liberty to cancel the provisional bail of the
                             petitioners.”
                       4. The Naresh Prasad and Manju Lata Pandey at the

          time of surrender and executing bail bond have deposited the

          amount of 25% of the defalcated amount for executing bail bond

          but as contended by learned counsel for newly appointed

          Chairman of PACS that thereafter they had not paid a single

          amount.

                       5. If it is so, the court below should have cancel the

          privilege of bail granted to Naresh Prasad and Manju Lata

          Pandey and taken them into custody.

                       6. The newly appointed Chairman of PACS is given

          liberty to move for the cancellation of the bail bonds of the

          Naresh Prasad and Manu Lata Pandey if they are not abiding by

          the orders of this Court dated 12.08.2025.

                       7. So far as these petitioners are concerned, they are

          members of the PACS and as the Naresh Prasad and Manju Lata

          Pandey have undertaken to pay the entire amount of defalcated

          money, the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners are
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57840 of 2025(5) dt.24-02-2026
                                                        5/5




                      allowed.

                                   8. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                      the prayer for bail.

                                   9. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above-named, in

                      the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in

                      the Court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing

                      bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                      Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura/concerned Court below,

                      in connection with Kusumbha P.S. Case No. 64 of 2024, subject

                      to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code

                      of Criminal Procedure/ Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                         (Sandeep Kumar, J)

Ranjeet/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.