Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bashistha Thakur @ Ranjan Kumar ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed the petition.

Summary

Bashistha Thakur applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal miscellaneous case. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought permission from the court to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the request to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an applicant can withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested
  • Whether the court may permit such withdrawal

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58089 of 2025
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran
                  ======================================================
                  Bashistha Thakur @ Ranjan Kumar Thakur S/o Kedar Thakur R/o Village -
                  Manjhi Miyapatti, P.S.- Manjhi, District- Saran

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Harish Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    08-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks

                    permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application

                    as petitioner during pendency of the same was arrested.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.


                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.