Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

Holding

The court denied anticipatory bail to petitioner No. 1 but granted it to petitioners No. 2 and No. 3.

Summary

The petitioners, three brothers, were charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109(1), 74 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly entering a shop, abusing the informant, attempting to outrage her modesty and assaulting her son with a pistol butt. They filed an application for anticipatory bail. The State argued that there were specific allegations, particularly against petitioner No. 1, relating to harassment and threats. The petitioners contended that the allegations were vague, that they were falsely implicated, and that the injury to the victim was simple. The Court, considering the supervision note and the specificity of the case against petitioner No. 1, refused anticipatory bail to him, while granting bail to petitioners No. 2 and No. 3 on the basis that the allegations against them were general and the injury was minor. Bail for petitioners 2 and 3 was conditioned on a bond of Rs 10,000 and compliance with Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioner No. 1 in view of specific allegations under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.
  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioners No. 2 and No. 3 where the allegations are general and the injury is simple.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • assault
  • harassment
  • specific allegation
  • general allegation
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5868 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2025 Thana- CHIKSAUR District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
           1.     Rakesh Kumar S/o Vijay Prasad @ Nagina Prasad @ Vijay Yadav R/o
                  Village - Maranchi, P.O. and PS- Chiksaura, District- Nalanda
           2.    Golu Kumar S/o Vijay Prasad @ Nagina Prasad @ Vijay Yadav R/o Village -
                 Maranchi, P.O. and PS- Chiksaura, District- Nalanda
           3.    Ravi Kumar S/o Vijay Prasad @ Nagina Prasad @ Vijay Yadav R/o Village -
                 Maranchi, P.O. and PS- Chiksaura, District- Nalanda

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Anil Kumar Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Jai Narain Thakur
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   23-04-2026         1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                            Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                       2.   This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out

                            of Chiksaura Police Station Case No. 200 of 2025, dated

                            22.10.2025,       disclosing        offences       under      Sections

                            126(2)/115(2)/352/351(2)/109(1)/74/3(5) of the Bhartiya

                            Nyaya Sanhita.

                       3.   That the prosecution case, as per the First Information

                            Report, is that on 22.10.2025 at about 9:00 A.M., while

                            the informant was at her shop, the petitioners entered into

                            the informant’s shop, started abusing her, misbehaved
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5868 of 2026(5) dt.23-04-2026
                                            2/4




                   with her and tried to outrage her modesty. Upon alarm

                   being raised, the son of the informant came arrived there,

                   whereupon the petitioners assaulted him with pistol butt

                   causing him head injury. It has further been alleged that

                   when the husband of the informant arrived, he was also

                   assaulted and abused and was given life threats.

              4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

                   petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated

                   in the present case on the basis of concocted story. No

                   specific overt act has been alleged against the petitioners

                   and allegations against them are general and omnibus in

                   nature. He next submits that there is love affairs between

                   the informant’s daughter and petitioner no. 1 which was

                   opposed by the informant’s side due to which the present

                   occurrence has taken place. There is case and counter-

                   case between the parties inasmuch as the side of the

                   petitioners has lodged Chiksaura Police Station Case No.

                   205 of 2025 against the informant’s husband and others.

                   He further submits that the victim has sustained simple

                   injury caused by hard and blunt substance.

              5.   On the other hand, learned counsel for the State, referring

                   to the supervision note at paragraph no. 25 of the case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5868 of 2026(5) dt.23-04-2026
                                            3/4




                  diary, submits that allegation against the petitioner no. 1

                  is specific and due to his inappropriate behavior of

                  harassment and teasing and after several unsuccessful

                  attempts at counseling and resolution, the informant has

                  decided to discontinue her daughter’s schooling/tuition in

                  order to ensure her safety and protect her dignity.

              6. Regards being had to the submissions made on behalf of

                  the parties and taking into consideration the supervision

                  note at paragraph no. 25 of the case diary and the fact that

                  there is specific allegation against the petitioner no. 1, I

                  am not inclined to grant the petitioner no. 1 privilege of

                  anticipatory bail.

              7. This application with respect to petitioner no. 1 is,

                  accordingly, dismissed.

              8. Insofar as petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are concerned, the

                  allegations against them are general and omnibus in

                  nature and the victim has sustained simple injury, I am

                  inclined to grant petitioner nos. 2 and 3 privilege of

                  anticipatory bail.

              9. Let the petitioner nos. 2 and 3, above named, in the event

                  of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within

                  four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5868 of 2026(5) dt.23-04-2026
                                                        4/4




                              Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the

                              like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional

                              Chief Judicial Magistrate - I, Hilsa, Nalanda, in

                              connection with Chiksaura Police Station Case No. 200 of

                              2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section

                              482 (2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.



                                               (Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
ashwani/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.