Patna High Court
Ajeet Sahni @ Ajeet Kumar Sahni @ NishadversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- R P MISHRA
Holding
The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the stipulated bond and surety conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Ajeet Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving the seizure of 639 litres of liquor from five motorcycles, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He contended that his name was implicated solely on the basis of a co‑accused’s statement and that he had no involvement with the liquor or the motorcycles, also pointing out non‑compliance with Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The State opposed the bail. The Court examined the prima‑facie material and, noting the petitioner’s claim of false implication, ordered that he be released on anticipatory bail if arrested or surrendered within six weeks, upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in the present case
- Whether a prima facie case exists against the petitioner under the cited statutes
- Whether the procedural requirement of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been complied with
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 103, 482(2)
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 274, 275, 3(5)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- liquor seizure
- false implication
- prohibition act
- criminal procedure
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5915 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2025 Thana- DEODHA District- Madhubani
======================================================
Ajeet Sahni @ Ajeet Kumar Sahni @ Nishad S/o Bhogendra Sahani R/o
Village - Madhiya (Kamalawari), P.S - Basopatti, District - Madhubani
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Archna Aanand, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Asha Kumari, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
2 03-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP
for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Deodha PS Case No. 130 of 2025 instituted for the
offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise
Act and Sections 274, 275 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita, 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 639
litres of liquor was recovered from five motorcycles.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.
The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of
disclosure made by apprehended co-accused person. The
petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5915 of 2026(2) dt.03-02-2026
2/2
liquor. It is submitted that petitioner has no concern with the
motorcycles in question. The petitioner has three criminal
antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the
Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Learned counsel
for the petitioner, therefore, contends that prima-facie no case is
made out against the petitioner. Other co-accused has been
granted bail by this Court vide order dated 16.12.2025, passed
in Cr. Misc. No. 86679 of 2025.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed
the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances
of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of
arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period
of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court
below/concerned Court in connection with Deodha PS Case
No. 130 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under
Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita,
2023.
Raj Kishore/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
U T
Checking your session…