Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Anup SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, Anup Singh and Haripal Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition arising from a police case registered at Rasulpur, Saran. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the State of Bihar was represented by Mr. Braj Kishore Pd. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and counsel for the informant were present. The court examined the petition and noted the absence of any prosecution effort by the petitioners. Consequently, Justice Satyavrat Verma dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition should be entertained in the absence of any prosecution by the petitioners

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • non-prosecution
  • petition dismissal

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59738 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2025 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran
                  ======================================================
             1.    Anup Singh S/o- Haripal Singh Village- Nawada PS- Rasulpur Dist- Saran at
                   Chhapra
             2.   Haripal Singh S/o- Late Nagina Singh Village- Nawada PS- Rasulpur Dist-
                  Saran at Chhapra

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       None.
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Braj Kishore Pd.
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

5    01-05-2026                  1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioners.

                    Learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing

                    on behalf of the informant are present.

                                 2. The case is dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.