Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mahendra Bind @ Mahendra Prasad BindversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to bond, sureties and the conditions prescribed under the BNSS and CrPC.

Summary

The petitioners Mahendra Bind, Jitendra Bind and Rameshwar Bind sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Belaon PS No.46 of 2025) filed under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act. They claim they are innocent, falsely implicated, and that the prosecution is motivated by a land dispute with the informant. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The court observed that the FIR appears to be a mala fide prosecution and, considering the circumstances, ordered that the petitioners be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. The bail is subject to the conditions of Section 482 of the BNSS and Section 438(2) of the CrPC and to compliance with the lower court’s directions.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 438(2) of the CrPC.
  • Whether the FIR constitutes a mala fide prosecution warranting bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • false prosecution
  • land dispute
  • POCSO Act
  • criminal procedure
  • bail bond
  • BNSS
  • mala fide prosecution

Judgment

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60637 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2025 Thana- BELAW District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
                 ======================================================
           1.     Mahendra Bind @ Mahendra Prasad Bind S/o- Rameshwar Bind Village-
                 Ahiraw Ps- Belaon Dist- Kaimur at Bhabua
           2.    Jitendra Bind @ Jitendra Kumar S/o- Rameshwar Bind Village- Ahiraw Ps-
                 Belaon Dist- Kaimur at Bhabua
           3.    Rameshwar Bind @ Rameshwar Prasad S/o- Late Chaturi Bind @ Chaturi
                 Prasad Village- Ahiraw Ps- Belaon Dist- Kaimur at Bhabua

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Rima Devi W/o- Pintu Bind Village- Ahiraw Ps- Belaon Dist- Kaimur at
                 Bhabua

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate
                 For the State            :       Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                                   ORAL ORDER


6   12-03-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                  2. The service of notice is treated to be valid as the

                   same has been received by the husband of the opposite party no.

                   2.

                                  3. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection

                   with Belaon P.S. Case No. 46 of 2025 instituted under Sections

                   126(2), 115(2), 329(4), 74, 76, 79, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3) and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60637 of 2025(6) dt.12-03-2026
                                            2/3




          3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita to which later on Section 8

          of the POCSO Act was added.

                       4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are

          accused of assaulting the victim.

                       5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

          this case. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners

          are agnates of the informant and there is land dispute between

          the parties. There is counter case also.

                       6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

                       7. From the reading of the FIR, It appears to be a

          mala fide prosecution.

                       8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

          and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event

          of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks

          from today, the petitioners, above named, be released on bail

          upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          the learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-VI- cum

          Special Judge POCSO Act, Kaimur at Bhabua/ concerned Court

          in connection with Belaon P.S. Case No. 46 of 2025, subject to
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60637 of 2025(6) dt.12-03-2026
                                                       3/3




                     the conditions laid down in Section 482 of the BNSS/ 438(2) of

                     the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.


                                                                          (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.