Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shivanand Tiwari @ Shivanshu Kumar @ Anshu TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Shivanand Tiwari, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR alleging that he had a sexual relationship with a minor, the informant’s sister, and that his alleged mental and physical torture led her to commit suicide. The prosecution charged him under sections 103(1), 61(2), 108 and 64 of the B.N.S. and sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner argued he was innocent, citing lack of external injuries, absence of eyewitnesses, and the deceased being a major, and offered cooperation with the investigation. The State and the informant’s counsel opposed bail, emphasizing the specific accusations, the suicide note, and the seriousness of the offences. The Court, after considering the direct nature of the accusations and the material evidence, rejected the petition for anticipatory bail.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the charges of sexual abuse and related offences
  • Whether the allegations of mental and physical torture leading to suicide constitute sufficient ground to deny bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • POCSO Act
  • suicide
  • sexual abuse
  • mental torture
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6092 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-831 Year-2025 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
                 ======================================================
                 Shivanand Tiwari @ Shivanshu Kumar @ Anshu Tiwari S/o Nagina Tiwari @
                 Ram Nagina Tiwari Resident of Village- Parsiya, P.S.- Bhabhua, District-
                 Kaimur.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    X D/o Y R/o vill - Parsiya, P.S.- Bhabhua, Distt.- Kaimur

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :        Mr. Manan Kumar Mishra, Sr. Advocate
                                                 Mr. Vishwajeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate
                 For the State          :        Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, APP
                 For the Informant      :        Mr. Basant Kumar, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   31-03-2026                  Heard learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of

                   the petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and

                   learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1),

                   61(2), 108 and 64 of the B.N.S. and Sections 4 and 6 of the

                   POCSO Act.

                                3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that there was

                   love affair between this petitioner and minor sister of the

                   informant and this petitioner used to tease her and make

                   physical relations with her on the pretext of marriage and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6092 of 2026(3) dt.31-03-2026
                                            2/3




          thereafter, he refused to marry her and as a result of the mental

          and physical torture committed by this petitioner, minor sister of

          informant committed suicide.

                       4. It is submitted by learned senior counsel appearing

          on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and

          has committed no offence. At best, it is a case of suicide and

          petitioner cannot be held responsible for the same. As a matter

          of fact, the deceased was a major and though there is allegation

          of physical torture against this petitioner, however, as per post

          mortem report, no external injury was found on the person of the

          deceased. During investigation, no eye witness has claimed to

          have seen this petitioner near the place of occurrence or

          committing any torture with the deceased. Petitioner is a student

          and has got no criminal antecedents. Petitioner undertakes to

          cooperate with the investigation and appear before the

          investigating officer as and when required.

                       5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State and

          learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the

          prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and

          submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is

          specific accusation against this petitioner that because of the

          mental and physical torture committed by this petitioner, the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6092 of 2026(3) dt.31-03-2026
                                                         3/3




                       victim committed suicide. The suicide was prompted by

                       emotional distress over sexual abuse, torture and denial of this

                       petitioner for marriage. During investigating, one suicide note

                       was also recovered from the body of the deceased which also

                       goes to show that out of frustration and mental torture

                       committed by this petitioner, she was compelled to commit

                       suicide.

                                    6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                       case, specific and direct nature of accusation and materials that

                       have surfaced during investigation, the prayer for grant of

                       anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.



                                             (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.