Patna High Court
Yogendra Singh and OrsversusState Of Bihar and Anr
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
- Bench
- SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Holding
The criminal miscellaneous application is dismissed for default due to non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners, three individuals, filed a criminal miscellaneous application against the State of Bihar and another respondent. No counsel appeared for the petitioners, and the matter had previously been adjourned on 20-04-2026 for the same reason. The petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the case, which originated in 2018. The learned judge noted the absence of representation and the lack of prosecution. Consequently, the application was dismissed for default due to non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal miscellaneous application can be proceeded with when the petitioner fails to appear and shows no interest in prosecution
Subjects
- default judgment
- criminal miscellaneous application
- non‑prosecution
- adjournment
- procedural dismissal
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61814 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2018 Thana- HATHUA District- Gopalganj
======================================================
1. Yogendra Singh Son of Jotish Rai
2. Raj Kishore Singh Son of Shiv Nandan Rai
3. Jai Narayan Singh Son of ShivNandan Rai All Resident of Village-
Kaparkura Police Station-Hathua District-Gopalganj
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Satish Singh Son of Sriram Singh Resident of Village- Kaparpura Police
Station-Hathua District-Gopalganj.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
4 28-04-2026 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner, however,
learned A.P.P. for the State is present.
2. On the previous date also i.e. on 20.04.2026, no one
was present on behalf of the petitioner and the case was
adjourned.
3. Since the petitioner has no interest to pursue this
matter which is of the year 2018, accordingly, the present Cr.
Misc. Application stands dismissed for default due to non-
prosecution.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-
U T
Checking your session…