Patna High Court
SYED SULTAN ALAMversusState Of Bihar and Anr
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
- Bench
- SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Holding
The application is dismissed for default due to non‑prosecution.
Summary
Syed Sultan Alam filed a criminal miscellaneous application in 2018 against the State of Bihar and Chandan Kumar. No counsel appeared for the petitioner on the scheduled dates of 26 March 2026 and 28 April 2026, while the State's assistant public prosecutor was present. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter, which was several years old. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for default due to non‑prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear or prosecute a criminal miscellaneous application?
Subjects
- Criminal Procedure Code
- Default judgment
- Non‑prosecution
- Application dismissal
- High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62634 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3926 Year-2015 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District-
Patna
======================================================
Syed Sultan Alam Son of Syed Aftab Alam, Resident of Village- Kaghzi
Mohalla, P.S. Biharsharif, District- Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Chandan Kumar Son of Late Shyamn Babu Yadav Resident of Old
Khankarbhag, near College of Commerce gate No.15, P.S.-Patrakar
Nagar,Distt.-Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
3 28-04-2026 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner, however,
learned A.P.P. for the State is present.
2. On the previous date also i.e. on 26.03.2026, no one
was present on behalf of the petitioner and the case was
adjourned.
3. Since the petitioner has no interest to pursue this
matter which is of the year 2018, accordingly, the present Cr.
Misc. Application stands dismissed for default due to non-
prosecution.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-
U T
Checking your session…