Patna High Court
RANA SINGH @ RANA PRATAPversusThe State Of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
- Bench
- SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Holding
The application is dismissed for default due to non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Rana Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application arising from a 2014 police case (PS. Case No. 142). The matter was listed before the Patna High Court, but the petitioner failed to appear on the hearing dated 26 March 2026, leading to an adjournment. On the subsequent hearing on 28 April 2026, the petitioner again did not appear, and no counsel was appointed for him. The State of Bihar was represented by Advocate on Record Satya Nand Shukla. Observing that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter, the Court dismissed the application for default due to non‑prosecution. The order effectively closes the pending criminal miscellaneous application.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear and shows no interest in pursuing a criminal miscellaneous application?
Subjects
- criminal procedure
- default judgment
- non‑prosecution
- adjournment
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62691 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2014 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran
======================================================
Rana Singh @ Rana Pratap Son of Late Dinbandhu Singh @ Late Babloo
Singh, Resident of Village- Nawratanpur, P.S. Taraiya, District-Saran at
Chapra.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
3 28-04-2026 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner, however,
learned A.P.P. for the State is present.
2. On the previous date also i.e. on 26.03.2026, no one
was present on behalf of the petitioner and the case was
adjourned.
3. Since the petitioner has no interest to pursue this
matter which is of the year 2018, accordingly, the present Cr.
Misc. Application stands dismissed for default due to non-
prosecution.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-
U T
Checking your session…