Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nantun Mukhiya @ Sukhari MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that the petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Nantun Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. He then sought permission from the court to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the request to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner can withdraw his anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6367 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-402 Year-2025 Thana- SURSAND District- Sitamarhi
                  ======================================================
                  Nantun Mukhiya @ Sukhari Mukhiya S/o Ramjatan Mukhiya R/o Village -
                  Sursand, Near - Loha Pul, Ward No. 11, P.S.- Sursand, District - Sitamarhi

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Shashank Shekhar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    30-01-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                              2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the instant anticipatory bail

                    application.

                              3.    Permission is accorded.

                              4.    Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.