Patna High Court
Ram Yadav @ Ram Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The Court held that an anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn with its permission and therefore dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
Ram Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application before this Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then moved the Court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The State opposed the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested
- Whether the Court’s permission is required to withdraw an anticipatory bail application
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6554 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-207 Year-2025 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani
======================================================
Ram Yadav @ Ram Kumar Yadav S/o Rambinod Yadav @ Viltu Yadav
Resident of Village- Khaira Tol, Madhiya, P.S.- Basopatti, Dist.- Madhubani
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhavesh Kumar Sah
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Prasad
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 03-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner
during pendency of the same was arrested.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-
U T
Checking your session…