Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nasim @ Md. Nasim AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the second anticipatory bail application, dismissing it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Nasim Ansari, had filed two anticipatory bail applications in connection with R.S. P.S. Case No. 59 of 2025 before the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Araria. The petitioner later sought the court's permission to withdraw the second anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested that the withdrawal be allowed, and the State's counsel did not oppose the request. The Hon'ble Justice Satyavrat Verma considered whether the court could permit the withdrawal of an anticipatory bail application. The court granted permission, holding that the petitioner could withdraw the second application. Consequently, the second anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can permit the withdrawal of an anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • bail
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65560 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2025 Thana- R S P.S. District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Nasim @ Md. Nasim Ansari S/o Late Fatkan Ansari R/o Village - Rajokhar,
                 Ward No. 02, P.S - R.S, District - Araria
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Harendra Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Ms. Pushpa Sinha, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   10-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                   to withdraw the second anticipatory bail application.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. Accordingly,          the      second        anticipatory         bail

                   application is dismissed as withdrawn in connection with R.S.

                   P.S. Case No. 59 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned

                   Principal District & Sessions Judge, Araria/Successor Court.


                                                                           (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.