Patna High Court
Sikandar SinghversusState Of Bihar and Anr
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Holding
The application is disposed of as the petitioner withdrew his request and there was no objection from the State.
Summary
The petitioner, Sikandar Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash two orders dated 10-02-2009 and 01-02-2017 passed by the Magistrate in a complaint case. During the hearing on 31-03-2026, the petitioner informed the court that he no longer wished to pursue the application and requested its disposal. The State of Bihar, represented by an A.P.P., raised no objection to the petitioner's request. The court considered the submissions of both parties and, noting the petitioner's withdrawal, disposed of the application without further inquiry. Consequently, the earlier orders remain undisturbed.
Issues considered
- Whether the criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be entertained when the petitioner withdraws his request
- Whether the court should quash the earlier Magistrate orders in the absence of a substantive hearing
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
Subjects
- Criminal Procedure
- Section 482
- Quash Order
- Withdrawal of Petition
- High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65701 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2005 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE District-
Vaishali
======================================================
Sikandar Singh Son of late Mundrdika Singh Resident of Village Vayash
Chak, Police Station- Goraul, District- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Chhotu Singh Son of Kedar Singh Resident of Village Vayash Chak, Police
Station- Goraul, District- Vaishali.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Kanak Verma, Advocate.
Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Advocate.
Mr. Lalitesh Mani, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Gulnar Begam, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
2 31-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed
under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the orders dated
10.02.2009 & 01/02.02.2017 passed by learned Magistrate in
connection with Complaint Case No.97 of 2005/ Tr. No.3084 of
2016.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he
does not want to press the present petition, accordingly, prays
that the present case may be disposed of.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65701 of 2018(2) dt.31-03-2026
2/2
prayer of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions of learned counsels
for the parties, the present Cr. Misc. Application stands disposed
of.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-
U T
Checking your session…