Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Santosh Kumar Paswan @ Santosh Kumar PaspanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, finding insufficient direct evidence and procedural lapses.

Summary

Santosh Kumar Paswan was arrested in connection with a case involving the illegal possession of 1096.38 liters of liquor and a country‑made pistol, alleged to have been recovered from the house of co‑accused Ajit Kumar Kamti. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that no incriminating material was found in his possession, he was not present at the scene, and he has no prior criminal record. The prosecution opposed bail, while the petitioner’s counsel highlighted the lack of direct evidence and the non‑compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Considering these circumstances and the period of custody already endured, the Court decided to grant bail. The petitioner was ordered to be released on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the alleged recovery of liquor and a pistol from the co‑accused’s premises.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition act
  • arms act
  • procedural lapse
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6603 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2026 Thana- GHANSHYAMPUR District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Santosh Kumar Paswan @ Santosh Kumar Paspan S/o Rajendra Paswan R/o
                 Vill- Ghanshyampur, P.S - Ghanshyampur, District - Darbhanga, Bihar

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Anant Kumar 1, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   02-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Ghanshyampur P.S. Case No. 01 of 2026, instituted for the

                   offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise Act and Section 25(1-b)a, 35 of the Arms Act.

                                3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 1096.38

                   liters liquor and one country made pistol were recovered from

                   the house of co-accused.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from

                   the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got

                   no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The alleged
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6603 of 2026(2) dt.02-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     recovery of liquor and country made pistol has been made from

                     the house of co-accused Ajit Kumar Kamti. The petitioner was

                     not present at the place of occurrence. The name of the

                     petitioner has been disclosed by the local Chowkidar. The

                     petitioner is in custody since 02.01.2026 and has got no criminal

                     antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the

                     Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

                                  5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                     the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                                  6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                     of the case and the period of custody undergone by the

                     petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                                  7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

                     bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

                     below/concerned Court in connection with Ghanshyampur P.S.

                     Case No. 01 of 2026.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
manish/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.