Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Madhusudan Ray @ Masudhan RayversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to a bail bond and stipulated conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, Madhusudan Ray and Guddu Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging assault under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners attacked an informant with an iron rod, causing injuries, though the hospital report described the injuries as simple. The petitioners, who have no prior criminal record, offered to pay Rs.3,000 each to the informant for medical treatment. The State opposed the bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the assault allegations. Considering the simple nature of the injuries, lack of antecedents, and the petitioners' willingness to compensate the informant, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 each and specific conditions, including payment to the informant and compliance with trial procedures.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the accused despite the assault allegations under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
  • Whether the condition of payment to the informant for medical expenses is appropriate in granting bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • assault
  • simple injury
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • bail conditions
  • criminal antecedent
  • payment to informant

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66301 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2025 Thana- Pahelja P.S. District- Saran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Madhusudan Ray @ Masudhan Ray S/o Parma Ray R/o Village - Garib Patti
                  @ Garibapatti, Post - Kharika, P.S - Pahleja, District - Saran
           2.    Guddu Ray @ Anarjit Kumar S/o Parma Ray R/o Village - Garib Patti @
                 Garibapatti, Post - Kharika, P.S - Pahleja, District - Saran

                                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :        Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi, Advocate
                 For the State             :        Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   21-01-2026                                 Heard Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi, learned

                   counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned

                   APP representing the State.

                                 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in

                   connection with Pahleja P.S. Case No. 65 of 2025 registered for

                   the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2),

                   352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, lodged on

                   07.06.2025 by the informant, Usha Devi.

                                 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged

                   that the accused persons came and on petty issue started

                   abusing. Upon opposition, Soni Devi caught hold of her hair

                   and later, Madhusudan Rai (petitioner no.1) gave iron rod blow
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66301 of 2025(4) dt.21-01-2026
                                            2/4




          on her head causing injury. When the other family members

          came to rescue, the allegation is that Guddu Rai (petitioner no.2)

          assaulted Gajadhar Rai. They were referred to Referral Hospital,

          Sonepur, which followed the F.I.R.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has taken this

          Court to the injury report to show that the Sub-Divisional

          Hospital, Sonepur has recorded the injuries to be simple in

          nature. Admittedly, there is land dispute, both the petitioners do

          not have criminal antecedent. Last submission is that without

          accepting the allegation or outcome of the present petition, the

          petitioners intend to pay Rs.3,000/- each (totaling Rs.6,000/-) to

          the informant towards treatment by Demand Draft issued by the

          local branch of the State Bank of India/any Nationalized Bank

          to be submitted at the time of execution of bail bond.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that

          though the injuries are simple in nature, the allegation of assault

          is on both the petitioners.

                       6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also

          the aforesaid facts, injuries have been found to be simple in

          nature, the petitioners do not have criminal antecedent, in that

          background, this Court is inclined to extend them the privilege

          of anticipatory bail subject to payment of Rs.3,000/- each
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66301 of 2025(4) dt.21-01-2026
                                            3/4




          (totaling Rs.6,000/-) to the informant as undertaken by the

          learned counsel for the petitioners through Demand Draft issued

          by the local branch of the State Bank of India/any Nationalized

          Bank to be submitted at the time of execution of the bail bond

          and the same shall be handed over to the informant after

          checking the credentials.

                       7. Let the petitioners be released on bail in the event

          of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the

          receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

          (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Saran at

          Chapra, in connection with Pahleja P.S. Case No. 65 of 2025

          subject to the following conditions:-

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioners who shall provide official

          document (Aadhar Card/Voter Id/Driving License/Pan Card) to

          show his/her bona fide;

                       (ii) the petitioners shall appear on each and every date

          before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

          dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of their

          bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                       (iii) the petitioners shall in no way try to induce or
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66301 of 2025(4) dt.21-01-2026
                                                        4/4




                      promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                      failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                      cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                   (iv) the petitioners shall desist from committing any

                      criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                      to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds.



                                                     (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.