Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Anurag Hadi @ Anurag Handi @ Anurag HariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to bond and conditions under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

Anurag Hadi was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 317(5), 318(4), 336(3) and 338 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1‑B)(i), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a live cartridge was recovered from him and a country‑made katta and two cartridges from a co‑accused. The petitioner contended that the cartridge was planted, no firearm was recovered, and the seized motorcycle actually belonged to the co‑accused, asserting false implication. He had been in custody since 30‑07‑2025 and a chargesheet had been filed. The court, after considering the limited evidentiary basis, the period of custody and the chargesheet, ordered his release on bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and conditions under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in offences punishable under the B.N.S., 2023 and the Arms Act given the nature of the evidence.
  • Whether the recovery of a single live cartridge without a firearm justifies denial of bail.
  • Whether the petitioner was falsely implicated in the offences.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Arms Act
  • B.N.S. 2023
  • false implication
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 480(3)
  • chargesheet

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6708 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2025 Thana- KORHA District- Katihar
                 ======================================================
                 Anurag Hadi @ Anurag Handi @ Anurag Hari S/o Sanjay Hadi @ Sanjay
                 Handi, R/o Maheshpur, P.S- Korha, Distt- Katihar.
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Binod Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                   2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Korha P.S. Case No. 178 of 2025 dated

                   29.07.2025, registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 317(5), 318(4), 336(3) and 338 read with Section 3(5)

                   of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 25(1-B)(i), 26 and 35 of the

                   Arms Act.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, on a tip-off,

                   petitioner and co-accused were apprehended by the police who

                   were riding an unnumbered motorcycle. From this petitioner,

                   recovery of live cartridge was made and from the co-accused a

                   country made katta and two live cartridges were recovered.

                                   4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6708 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                            2/3




          the present case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from

          person or possession of the petitioner. The recovery shown from

          the petitioner is planted. Moreover, recovery is of only one live

          cartridge and in absence of fire-arm, there is no use of such

          cartridge. The motorcycle seized from the petitioner in fact

          belongs to the co-accused. Learned counsel next submits that

          petitioner is having antecedent of one case and chargesheet has

          been submitted. Learned counsel lastly submits that petitioner is

          in custody since 30.07.2025.

                          5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State

          opposes the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner.

                          6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          period of custody of the petitioner and submission of

          chargesheet, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be

          released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

          (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial

          Magistrate, Katihar / concerned Court, in connection with

          Korha P.S. Case No. 178 of 2025, subject to the condition laid

          down under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. and other following

          conditions:
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6708 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                      3/3




                                    (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the

                    petitioner.

                                    (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and

                    every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned

                    trial Court.

                                    (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates

                    or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

                    petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.



                                                                  (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

Shahnawaz/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.