Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dinanath SahniversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Dinanath Sahni filed an anticipatory bail application. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an applicant can withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67316 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2025 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali
                  ======================================================
                  Dinanath Sahni S/O Mewalal Sahni R/O Village- Madhusudan Pakri, P.S.-
                  Lalganj, District- Vaishali

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    07-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                    petitioner, during pendency of the anticipatory bail application was

                    arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly,        the      instant      anticipatory           bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                              (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.