Patna High Court
Abhay Singh @ Abhay Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar through the Superintendent of Police, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Patna
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
Anticipatory bail was denied.
Summary
Petitioner Abhay Singh, a former Head Clerk in the Assistant Drug Controller's office, applied for anticipatory bail after a vigilance case was registered alleging he demanded a Rs 20,000 bribe to facilitate a drug licence for the informant. The petitioner argued he had no role in licence issuance because the process is fully computerized, he had been removed from the additional charge, and he possessed a clean antecedent. The State contended that the informant’s recorded conversation proved the demand for a bribe and that the petitioner refused to provide a voice sample during investigation. The court examined whether the allegations under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act warranted the grant of anticipatory bail. Finding the accusations credible and the petitioner’s non‑cooperation indicative of guilt, the court refused the anticipatory bail application.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances of the alleged offence under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act
- Whether the evidence presented (recorded conversation and refusal to cooperate) is sufficient to deny anticipatory bail
Legislation cited
- Prevention of Corruption Act — s. 7(a)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- bribery
- corruption
- Prevention of Corruption Act
- drug licence
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67575 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2025 Thana- VIGILANCE District- Patna
======================================================
Abhay Singh @ Abhay Kumar Singh S/O Late Bijay Kumar Singh R/O Flat
No. 1A, Sai Residency, East Boring Canal Road, P.S.- Budha Colony, Dist.-
Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Superintendent of Police, Vigilance
Investigation Bureau, Patna Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, A.P.P.
For the Informant : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
5 12-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant
and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in Vigilance P. S. Case
No. 57 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under
Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
3. It is alleged that this petitioner demanded bribe of
Rs. 20,000 for issuing drug license to the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner
has no role in grant of drug license as he was working as Head
Clerk in the office of Assistant Drug Controller which is fully
computerized where all the work is done online with records of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67575 of 2025(5) dt.12-03-2026
2/2
every minute regarding the status of applications and movement
of files and as such, entire allegation is based on surmises and
conjectures. Moreover, petitioner has already been removed
from the additional charge vide letter contained in Memo No.
753 dated 05.07.2025 issued by the Assistant Drug Controller,
Patna Nagar Nigam Region, Patna (Annexure-P/2). Petitioner
claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed
the bail application and submitted that informant applied for
drug license on 10.01.2025 where this petitioner demanded Rs.
20,000/- as bribe which was secretly recorded by the informant
and upon inquiry, allegation was found true. During
investigation also, petitioner was twice asked by the department
to give his voice sample but he refused to co-operate with the
investigation.
6. Considering the nature of accusation and conduct
of the petitioner, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is
refused.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U T
Checking your session…