Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

DIPAK MAHTOversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Dipak Mahto filed an anticipatory bail application but inadvertently submitted it as a regular bail petition. During the pendency of the application he was arrested, and he sought the court’s permission to withdraw the bail petition. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the bail claim were examined. The order dealt solely with the procedural defect and the petitioner’s request to withdraw.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application filed erroneously as a regular bail petition can be withdrawn after the petitioner’s arrest
  • Whether the court may dismiss the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • bail procedure
  • criminal procedure
  • court order

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6781 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-444 Year-2025 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 DIPAK MAHTO Son of Shiv Balak Mahto Resident of village - Kadhan, P.S.-
                 Kesariya, District - East Champaran
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Nafisu Zzoha
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   03-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset

                   submits that inadvertently instead of anticipatory bail, regular

                   bail application has been typed and thus submits that the said

                   defect would be rectified during the course of the day. It is

                   further submitted that petitioner during pendency of the instant

                   anticipatory bail application was arrested, thus seeks permission

                   to withdraw the same.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is

                   dismissed as withdrawn.



                                              (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.