Patna High Court
Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed because there was no prosecution against the petitioners.
Summary
Manoj Yadav and Sanoj Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on their behalf, while the State was represented by Advocate Mithlesh Kumar Khare. The court examined the application and found that there was no prosecution pending against the petitioners. Consequently, the court dismissed the anticipatory bail application on the ground of non-prosecution. The order was delivered by Justice Satyavrat Verma.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate basis for granting or denying anticipatory bail when no prosecution is pending?
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- non-prosecution
- criminal procedure
- high court order
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67857 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2025 Thana- BARH District- Patna
======================================================
1. Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Kumar Yadav S/o Nawal Prasad R/o Village-
Harauli, Police Station- Barh, District- Patna
2. Sanoj Yadav S/o Nawal Prasad R/o Village- Harauli, Police Station- Barh,
District- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 10-02-2026 None appears on behalf of the petitioners. Learned
APP is present.
2. The instant anticipatory bail application is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sanjay/-
U T
Checking your session…