Patna High Court
Sanjiv Yadav @ Vikash Yadav @ Sanjeev Kumar @ Vikas KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The court held that the petitioner may withdraw the anticipatory bail application, and therefore dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Sanjiv Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court’s permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application after being arrested during its pendency
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal
- criminal procedure
- arrest
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68032 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-575 Year-2025 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna
======================================================
Sanjiv Yadav @ Vikash Yadav @ Sanjeev Kumar @ Vikas Kumar S/o
Dinanath Ray R/o Ward No. 14, near SBI, Sultanpur, P.S.- Danapur, District-
Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhukar Anand, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
3 13-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail application
was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail
application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-
U T
Checking your session…