Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Prince Kumar and AnrversusThe State Of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The petition is disposed of, granting the petitioners liberty to raise all points before the trial court as prayed for.

Summary

The petitioners, Prince Kumar and Sonu Kumar, filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 23.03.2017 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 370(A)(ii) and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. They argued that the matter could be disposed of while allowing them to raise all points raised in the petition before the trial court at an appropriate stage. The State had no objection to this prayer. The Court, after hearing counsel, disposed of the petition, granting the petitioners the liberty to present their points before the trial court as sought. No substantive merits of the criminal charges were decided.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate taking cognizance of the offences under IPC and ITPA should be quashed
  • Whether the petitioners may be allowed to raise all points before the trial court at a later stage

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • quash order
  • cognizance
  • IPC
  • Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act
  • criminal procedure
  • liberty to raise points

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68255 of 2018
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-723 Year-2016 Thana- BHAGALPUR KOTWALI District-
                                                        Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Prince Kumar Son of Ashok Mandal, resident of Village- Baidachak, P.S.-
                  Panjwara, District- Banka.
           2.    Sonu Kumar, Son of Subhash Pd. Sah, Resident of Mohalla- Railway
                 Colony, P.S.- Majahidpur, District- Bhagalpur.

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State Of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Ms. Shashi Priya Pathak, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   14-05-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                               2. This application has been filed for quashing the

                   order dated 23.03.2017 passed by learned Chief Judicial

                   Magistrate, Bhagalpur in Kotwali P.S. Case No.723 of 2016

                   whereby and whereunder the court concerned took cognizance

                   against the petitioners for the offence under Sections 370(A)(ii),

                   120B of I.P.C. and Sections 3, 4, 5 6 and 8 of Immoral Traffic

                   (Prevention) Act.

                               3.Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this

                   case may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to take all

                   the points raised in this petition, before the learned Trial Court
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68255 of 2018(3) dt.14-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                     at appropriate stage.

                                  4. Learned APP for the State has no objection to this

                     prayer of the petitioners.

                                   5. In view of the above submission, this petition is

                     disposed of with the liberty as prayed for.



                                             (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Harish/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.