Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court extended the time for surrender and furnishing bail bonds by six weeks, modifying the earlier anticipatory bail order.

Summary

The petitioner Kundan Kumar had been granted anticipatory bail on 04.11.2025 with a direction to surrender and furnish bail bonds within six weeks. He failed to comply because he was residing outside the state and could not communicate with his lawyer. He filed an application seeking a modification of the earlier order to extend the time for surrender and furnishing bail bonds, offering an unconditional apology. The Additional Public Prosecutor raised no objection. The Court, satisfied that the non‑compliance was not deliberate and was due to bona‑fide reasons, extended the surrender period by another six weeks on the same terms, thereby modifying the earlier order. The application for modification was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner can be granted an extension of time to surrender and furnish bail bonds under the anticipatory bail order
  • Whether the Court can modify its earlier anticipatory bail order on the ground of bona‑fide inability to comply

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • modification of order
  • extension of time
  • bail bonds
  • High Court
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6891 of 2026
                                              In
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73468 of 2025
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-437 Year-2025 Thana- BARH District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Kundan Kumar S/o- Bhaso Prasad Yadav @ Bhaso Yadav @ Bhaso Prasad
                 Village- Milkipar PS- Barh District- Patna and at present Village-
                 Budhanichak Police Station- Barh District- Patna

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Ms. Anjana, Advocate
                                                   Mr. Shiv Kumar Prasad, Advocate
                                                   Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K., Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Shailendra Kumar, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-02-2026                   This application has been filed for modification of the

                   order dated 04.11.2025 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.

                   73468 of 2025, whereby the petitioner was granted the privilege

                   of anticipatory bail with a direction to surrender and furnish bail

                   bonds within a period of six weeks.

                                 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no

                   earlier application for modification has been filed by the

                   petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner, along with

                   one other accused, had been granted anticipatory bail by this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6891 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026
                                            2/3




          Court vide order dated 04.11.2025 passed in Criminal

          Miscellaneous No. 73468 of 2025. However, the petitioner

          could not surrender and furnish bail bonds within the stipulated

          period of six weeks solely due to lack of proper communication

          with his Pairvikar, as the petitioner was residing outside the

          State for earning his livelihood and maintaining his family. It is

          further submitted that the non-compliance of the order of this

          Court was neither deliberate nor intentional and the petitioner

          tenders his unconditional apology before this Court. A prayer

          has been made for extension of time for surrender and

          furnishing of bail bonds.

                       4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for

          the State has no objection over the same.

                       5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

          and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this

          Court is satisfied that the petitioner could not comply with the

          earlier order within the stipulated period due to bona fide

          reasons. Accordingly, time for surrender of the petitioner for

          furnishing bail bonds is extended by another six weeks from

          today, on same terms and conditions as stipulated in order dated

          04.11.2025 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 73468 of

          2025 in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 437 of 2025 to the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6891 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                      satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate -I,

                      Barh, Patna.

                                   6. Accordingly, order dated 04.11.2025 passed in Cr.

                      Misc. No. 73468 of 2025 is modified to the extent stated above.

                                   7. The present modification application, accordingly,

                      stands allowed.

                                   8. Let this order be communicated to the court of

                      learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistate-I, Barh, Patna in

                      connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 437 of 2025 for needful.



                                              (Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
Nilmani/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.