Patna High Court

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Kumar YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

Decided: 7 January 2026
Disposal: D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE
Bench: SATYAVRAT VERMA

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Suraj Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the State was represented by Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara. The court observed that there was no prosecution instituted against the petitioner. Accordingly, Justice Satyavrat Verma dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The order was pronounced on 7 January 2026.

Issues considered

Whether the petition can proceed in the absence of any prosecution against the petitioner?

Subjects

criminal procedure
non‑prosecution
dismissal
Patna High Court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69306 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-365 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada
                  ======================================================
                  Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Kumar Yadav S/O Ramkhelawan Yadav Resident of
                  Village- Sansar Pokhar, Ward No 19, P.S.- Suryagarha, District- Lakhisarai,

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State Of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       None.
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    07-01-2026                  1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. The

                    learned A.P.P. for the State is present.

                                 2. The case is dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…