Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Saheb KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Saheb Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.69391 of 2025) before the Patna High Court arising from a police case registered in East Champaran. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State was represented by Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma. The matter was listed before Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma on 2 April 2026. The court observed that the petitioner had not prosecuted the case. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to prosecute a criminal miscellaneous petition?

Subjects

  • criminal miscellaneous
  • non-prosecution
  • case dismissal
  • procedural default
  • Patna High Court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69391 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2024 Thana- ADAPUR District- East Champaran
                  ======================================================
                  Saheb Kumar Son of Vivichan Rai @ Birchan Rai @ Birchan Prasad Yadav
                  @ Shivchand Rai @ Vidhi Chand Ray Resident of village - Koraiya Paschmi,
                  P.S.- Mahuawa, District - East Champaran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       None
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    02-04-2026               1.    No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

                              2.    Learned A.P.P. for the State is present.

                              3.    The case is dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.