Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sunita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that, given the simple injuries, land‑dispute context, and FIR delay, anticipatory bail may be granted subject to prescribed conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, a family of four, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. alleging that they assaulted an informant during a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners were armed and caused injuries, but the petitioners argued that the injuries were simple, caused by blunt objects, and occurred on non‑vital parts of the body. They also highlighted a five‑day delay in filing the FIR and the existence of a counter‑case arising from the land dispute. The court considered these facts, the nature of the injuries, and the delay, and held that anticipatory bail could be granted subject to conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners were released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, one of whom must be a close relative, and with a direction to cooperate with the investigation.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 438 CrPC and Section 482(2) B.N.S. in view of the alleged offences.
  • Whether the simple nature of injuries, the land‑dispute background, and the delay in lodging the FIR justify the grant of bail.
  • Whether the petitioners pose a risk of evading trial or tampering with evidence.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 438
  • Section 482
  • land dispute
  • simple injuries
  • delay in FIR
  • Bihar High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69782 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2025 Thana- NAUTAN District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
           1.     Sunita Devi D/O Ramakant Sharma, W/O Lalan Sharma Resident of
                  Laxmipur, Naya Tola, P.S- Town, Distt.- Siwan, Bihar.
           2.    Ramakant Sharma S/O Late Babulal Sharma R/O Village- Sujaw Tola,
                 Musahari, P.S- Nautan, Distt.- Siwan, Bihar.
           3.    Satendra Kumar Sharma @ Satendra Sharma S/O Ramakant Sharma R/O
                 Village- Sujaw Tola, Musahari, P.S- Nautan, Distt.- Siwan, Bihar.
           4.    Nagendra Kumar Sharma @ Nagendra Sharma S/O Ramakant Sharma R/O
                 Village- Sujaw Tola, Musahari, P.S- Nautan, Distt.- Siwan, Bihar.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Abhijeet Abhigyan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, A.P.P
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   21-01-2026                           Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned A.P.P for the State.

                                    2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

                   registered under Sections 126 (2), 115(2), 118 (1), 109, 117 (2),

                   352, 3 (5) and 351 (2) of B.N.S.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, all the accused

                   persons who are the petitioners here came variously armed and

                   indulged in hurling abuses and assaulting the informant and

                   others.

                                    4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69782 of 2025(4) dt.21-01-2026
                                            2/3




          although there are specific allegations of assault attributed to

          these petitioners but the injury reports which are available in the

          case diary would indicate that all these injuries are simple in

          nature and caused by hard and blunt substance. The nature of

          injury of Satrughan Sharma has been reserved but it appears that

          the same is caused by hard and blunt object and that too on a

          non-vital part of the body. It is further submitted that there is a

          case and counter case between the parties arising out of a land

          dispute. Furthermore, the F.I.R. itself has been lodged after a

          delay of five days for which no explanation has been tendered.

                          5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed

          by learned A. P.P. for the State.

                          6. Taking into consideration the facts and

          circumstances and also considering the fact that the nature of

          injuries attributable to the petitioners, in the background of case

          and counter case arising out of land dispute coupled with the

          factum of delay, let the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or

          surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four

          weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with

          Nautan P.S. Case No. 124 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of

          Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69782 of 2025(4) dt.21-01-2026
                                                         3/3




                       where the case is pending subject to the condition laid down

                       under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section

                       482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023, further subject to the following

                       condition(s):

                                    (i) One of the bailors would be close relative/family

                       members of the petitioners.

                                    (ii)   The petitioners will cooperate in the investigation

                       and trial and in case of any act of non-cooperation, the prosecution

                       would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of bail

                       bonds of the petitioners.



                                                 (Soni Shrivastava, J)
vashudha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.