Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Julfikar @ JulfikarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, three brothers, were arrested in connection with a violent incident involving assault and theft, and have been in custody since August 2025. They sought regular bail under multiple sections of the B.N.S., claiming innocence and alleging that the case arose from a land dispute and a prior altercation over a common toilet. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The petitioners argued that there is no specific allegation against them, they have no criminal record, the parties have now compromised, and there is no risk of absconding or evidence tampering. Considering the compromise, lack of antecedent, and the period already spent in custody, the court ordered bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties each. The bail order effectively releases the petitioners pending trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352, 351 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. in view of the nature of the alleged offences and the circumstances of compromise.

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 109, 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 303(2), 3(5), 351, 352

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • compromise
  • serious offences
  • Bihar
  • B.N.S.

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.699 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-334 Year-2025 Thana- BAISI District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
           1.     Md. Julfikar @ Julfikar Son of Hazi Md. Mangalu @ Hazi Mangalu
                  Resident of Majalishpur, P.S.- Baisi, District- Purnea.
           2.    Sajid @ Sajid Alam Son of Late Hazi Md. Manglu @ Hazi Mangalu
                 Resident of Majalishpur, P.S.- Baisi, District- Purnea.
           3.    Munazir @ Nazir Alam Son of Late Hazi Md. Manglu @ Hazi Mangalu
                 Resident of Majalishpur, P.S.- Baisi, District- Purnea.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Sarveshwar Tiwary, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   20-02-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Petitioners seek regular bail in a case registered

                   under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352, 351

                   and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

                                3. As per prosecution case, on the alleged date of

                   occurrence while the informant was returning after closing the

                   toilet gate, the accused persons including petitioners having

                   armed with deadly weapons started abusing her and accused

                   Nazir and Sazid gave sword blow on the person of informant’s

                   father due to which he sustained injury. It is further alleged that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.699 of 2026(3) dt.20-02-2026
                                            2/3




          the accused persons also assaulted the mother of the informant

          by entering her house and took away valuable items.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

          petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this

          case. The altercation took place on account of path and common

          toilet. No specific allegation is attributed to the petitioners rather

          there is general and omnibus allegation against them. Both

          parties are full brothers and there is land dispute between them.

          There is case and counter case between both sides. Both parties

          have now compromised the case. After investigation, the charge

          sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of

          absconding of the petitioners or tampering with the evidence.

          Petitioners are in jail since 17.08.2025 having no criminal

          antecedent and they undertake to cooperate in the trial.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of

          the petitioners.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, submissions of the parties and the fact that both parties are

          full brothers and have compromised the case, having no

          criminal antecedent and the period of custody undergone by

          them, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.699 of 2026(3) dt.20-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                     learned C.J.M., Purnea/concerned court in connection with Baisi

                     P.S. Case No.334 of 2025.



                                             (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Harish/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.