Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sujeet Yadav @ Sujit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court granted permission to withdraw the bail application and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Sujeet Yadav, was convicted in a criminal case and subsequently filed a regular bail application. The petitioner later sought the court's permission to withdraw this bail application. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that withdrawal was permissible despite the conviction. The court considered whether it could grant such permission after conviction. Finding no legal impediment, the court accorded permission to withdraw the bail application. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner convicted in a criminal case can withdraw a regular bail application
  • Whether the court may grant permission to withdraw a bail application after conviction

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal procedure
  • conviction

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69959 of 2025
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2024 Thana- BIND District- Nalanda
                  ======================================================
                  Sujeet Yadav @ Sujit Yadav S/O Krishna Ballabh Yadav R/O Village- Madan
                  Chack, P.S.- Bind, Dist.- Nalanda

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Ms.Nelima Sinha
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Ms.Sangeeta Sharma
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

4    30-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                    petitioner has been convicted and thus, seeks permission to

                    withdraw the present regular bail application.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.