Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bahadur Khan @ Arif Khan @ Miyazi @ Md. Arif Khan Niyazi @ Arif Khyan MiyajiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted pre‑arrest bail to the petitioners subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

The petitioners, three residents of Bhagwan Bazar, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case (PS Case No. 329 of 2025) alleging extortion of Rs 15 lakhs, damage to property and theft, offences listed under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They contended that the alleged incident occurred in a busy market area without any eyewitness or CCTV evidence and that the case was a false attempt to evict one petitioner from a leased house. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the specific extortion allegations. After hearing both sides and noting the petitioners' undertaking to cooperate, the court granted bail subject to a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, one of whom must be a close family member, invoking Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The order also directed surrender within four weeks if arrested.

Issues considered

  • Whether pre‑arrest bail should be granted to the accused under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 despite serious extortion allegations.
  • Whether the absence of eyewitnesses or CCTV footage warrants the grant of bail.
  • Whether the petitioners' criminal antecedents affect the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • pre‑arrest bail
  • extortion
  • Section 482
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
  • criminal antecedent
  • lack of evidence
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70924 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-329 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWAN BAZAR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Bahadur Khan @ Arif Khan @ Miyazi @ Md. Arif Khan Niyazi @ Arif
                  Khyan Miyaji Son of Late Ali Khan @ Md. Ali Khan Resident of Mohalla -
                  Bari Masjid, Nai Bazar, Police Station - Bhagwan Bazar, District - Saran.
           2.    Meraj Khan @ Meaj Alam @ Md. Meraj Son of Late Ayub Khan Resident
                 of Mohalla - Bari Masjid, Nai Bazar, Police Station - Bhagwan Bazar,
                 District - Saran.
           3.    Amir Khan @ Md. Amir Khan Son of Meraj Khan @ Md. Meraj Khan
                 Resident of Mohalla - Bari Masjid, Nai Bazar, Police Station - Bhagwan
                 Bazar, District - Saran.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Amir Alam, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Surendra Kumar, Adv.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-02-2026                  Heard learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the

                   State.

                                2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in

                   connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 329 of 2025,

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2),

                   126(2), 308(2), 308(5), 352, 351(2), (3), 324(4), (5) and 3(5) of

                   the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioners is of demanding

                   extortion of rupees fifteen lakhs by putting threat upon the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70924 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                            2/4




          informant, besides there is allegation of damaging the office and

          snatching away Rs. 2,60,000/- from the office of the informant.

                       4. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the

          petitioners submitted that the entire occurrence is said to be

          taken place in the office of the informant which is situated at

          Raj Market Dak Bunglow Road, Bhagwan Bazar, a busiest

          place, but surprisingly there is neither any eye witness to the

          alleged occurrence, nor the police during the course of

          investigation collect any CCTV footage. As a matter of fact, the

          petitioner no. 1 executed a lease agreement on 24.12.2023 with

          one Bibi Rehana Praveen, and the informant and his son, who

          are also engaged in sale and purchase of immovable properties,

          they wanted to grab the said house by putting pressure and the

          present case is nothing but a move to oust the petitioner from

          the said place. It is further contended that after the alleged

          incidence, the muscle men of informant’s side have brutally

          assaulted one Intekhab Khan, who is associated with the

          petitioners with a view to put pressure which led to institution of

          Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 325 of 2025. The sister of the

          petitioner no. 3 has also filed an application before the

          Superintendent of Police to investigate the matter in a right

          direction, so that they can be absolved from the false
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70924 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                            3/4




          implication. The petitioner nos. 2 and 3 have absolutely fair

          antecedent, whereas the petitioner no. 1 bears one criminal

          antecedent, which is arising out of a complaint case.

                       5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State

          vehemently opposed the pre-arrest bail application and submits

          that there is a specific accusation against the petitioners of

          committing crime of extortion.

                       6. Having heard the learned Advocate for the

          respective parties and taking note of the materials collected

          during the course of investigation, besides the previous dispute

          as also the undertaking of the petitioners before this Court that

          they will fully cooperate with the proceeding of the Court, let

          the petitioners above named be released on bail, in the event of

          their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period

          of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of

          this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten

          thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-

          2nd, Saran at Chapra in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S.

          Case No. 329 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in

          Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

          with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70924 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                                         4/4




                       own/close family members of the petitioner.



                                                   (Harish Kumar, J)
supratim/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.